Fast responses, clear guidance, and immediate action when your case can’t wait
California treats firearm discharge offenses seriously because firing a weapon in or near populated areas can endanger the public even when no one is hurt. Depending on the facts, a discharge allegation may lead to felony exposure, custody time, firearm restrictions, and lasting record consequences.
Criminal defense attorney Anna R. Yum, founding attorney of the Law Offices of Anna R. Yum, has extensive experience representing clients in the San Diego Superior Court on firearm-related charges. Our team provides strategic discharge of a firearm defense in San Diego and serves clients in Chula Vista, El Cajon, Escondido, Oceanside, and communities throughout San Diego County.
This page explains the two primary California statutes governing the discharge of a firearm, how prosecutors file these charges, potential penalties and enhancements, common defenses, and what to expect in the San Diego court system. Contact our gun crimes defense lawyer at (619) 233-4433 today to schedule a free consultation.
A was referred by a few and different but trusted sources that I personally trust their advices, the firm of Anna R Yum. Since the first day in office I was welcomed, understood, felt comfortable and confident…
I am deeply grateful for the care and support I received from Anna Yum Law Office. From the very first consultation, Anna and her team made me feel heard…
California prosecutes firearm discharge offenses primarily under Penal Code § 246 and Penal Code § 246.3. The statute a prosecutor chooses depends on the facts, including whether the firearm was discharged at a PC 246 target and whether the alleged conduct was willful, malicious, or grossly negligent.
Penal Code § 246 makes it a felony to willfully and maliciously discharge a firearm at an inhabited dwelling house, inhabited housecar, inhabited camper, occupied building, occupied motor vehicle, or occupied aircraft. The statute does not require anyone to be inside an inhabited dwelling, housecar, or camper at the time of the shooting. “Inhabited” means the place is currently being used for dwelling purposes, even if no one is home.
PC 246 is prosecuted as a felony and can create serious felony and strike exposure. Prosecutors may pursue PC 246 in drive-by shooting cases, neighborhood disputes involving gunfire, and domestic violence incidents where a firearm was discharged at a home.
Penal Code § 246.3 addresses the willful discharge of a firearm in a “grossly negligent” manner that could result in injury or death. Unlike PC 246, this statute does not require the defendant to have fired at a specific structure or vehicle. Firing a gun into the air may qualify under PC 246.3 if the discharge was grossly negligent and could have resulted in injury or death, even if the shooter had no particular target.
PC 246.3 is a wobbler offense, meaning the prosecutor can charge it as either a felony or a misdemeanor depending on the facts and the defendant’s criminal history. That charging decision can significantly affect custody exposure and record consequences.
San Diego County prosecutors may evaluate several factors when choosing between PC 246 and PC 246.3, including:
In cases where the evidence could support more than one charge, prosecutors may evaluate whether PC 246, PC 246.3, or another resolution is appropriate. Early legal review of the evidence may help identify charging issues before the case moves further through court.
Key Takeaway: PC 246 and PC 246.3 address different types of firearm discharge allegations. PC 246 focuses on shootings directed at listed inhabited or occupied targets, while PC 246.3 focuses on grossly negligent discharge that could cause injury or death. The charging distinction affects felony exposure, defenses, and case strategy.
We keep you informed with timely updates and straightforward guidance, so you’re never left in the dark
I cannot say enough great things about my experience working with the Law Office of Anna Yum. From the very beginning, they demonstrated an unmatched level of professionalism, dedication, and expertise. They took the time to truly understand…
I had an excellent experience with The Law Offices of Anna R. Yum. The team was incredibly helpful, highly responsive, and handled my matter with efficiency and professionalism. They took the time to clearly explain every step, responded…
Proven results, personal attention, and the prosecutorial insight that changes everything.
The government bears the burden of proving every element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution cannot prove even one element, the charge fails.
To secure a conviction under Penal Code § 246, the prosecution must prove each required element, including:
The term “maliciously” means the defendant intended to do a wrongful act or acted with the unlawful intent to annoy or injure another person. It does not require proof that the defendant intended to kill or physically harm someone.
To convict under Penal Code § 246.3, the prosecution must prove each required element. The felony or misdemeanor classification affects sentencing exposure, not the elements.
“Gross negligence” means the defendant acted in a way that created a high risk of death or great bodily injury, and a reasonable person would have known that acting in that way would create such a risk.
Penalties vary significantly depending on which statute applies, whether the offense is charged as a felony or misdemeanor, and whether sentence enhancements are alleged. The table below summarizes the potential sentences under each classification.
| Offense | Classification | Potential Sentence |
|---|---|---|
| PC 246, Shooting at Inhabited Dwelling or Occupied Vehicle/Aircraft | Felony | 3, 5, or 7 years in state prison, or 6 months to 364 days in county jail |
| PC 246.3, Negligent Discharge (Felony) | Wobbler: Felony | 16 months, 2, or 3 years under Penal Code § 1170(h), with custody placement depending on whether a state-prison exception applies |
| PC 246.3, Negligent Discharge (Misdemeanor) | Wobbler: Misdemeanor | Up to 364 days in county jail |
A PC 246 conviction can qualify as a serious felony and strike under California Penal Code § 1192.7(c). The serious felony statute specifically lists discharge of a firearm at an inhabited dwelling, vehicle, or aircraft in violation of PC 246. Other PC 246 cases may require record-specific analysis, including whether the conviction establishes personal firearm use. When a conviction counts as a strike, it can double the sentence for a future felony and can trigger a 25-year-to-life sentence on a third strike.
Felony PC 246.3 can create strike exposure when the conviction qualifies as a serious felony, including when the record establishes personal firearm use. Even when a PC 246.3 conviction is not treated as a strike, a felony conviction can still carry custody time, a felony record, firearm restrictions, and long-term collateral consequences.
California firearm enhancements can greatly increase punishment, but the enhancement depends on the charged offense and the facts proved. Penal Code § 12022.53 adds 10- and 20-year enhancements only for the felonies listed in subdivision (a) of that statute. PC 246 is not listed in subdivision (a), but § 12022.53(d) can still add 25 years to life if the defendant personally and intentionally discharged a firearm and proximately caused great bodily injury or death to someone other than an accomplice. Other firearm enhancements may also be alleged depending on the charges.
Penal Code § 12022.5 can add an additional, consecutive three, four, or ten years for personal firearm use during a felony, subject to statutory limits and the court’s authority to strike or dismiss the enhancement in the interest of justice.
I am very well pleased with the legal services from Anna Yum and her team! They were not only professional, but very attentive and caring to my family and our family member who was their client. They took our case which was in a different…
I am so grateful to have Anna and her team help me with my case. They had been with me every step of the way through a long (almost 3 year) case, and they had made me feel safe in my position when I felt like, at times, I may fail. I can not thank each…
For non-citizens in San Diego, a firearm discharge conviction can create serious immigration risks. Certain firearm convictions can trigger deportability concerns, and some cases may raise aggravated felony or crime involving moral turpitude issues depending on the exact offense, sentence, and record of conviction.
Immigration consequences should be evaluated before any plea is entered because a resolution that appears favorable in criminal court may still create immigration risks if not structured carefully.
A firearm discharge charge is not a conviction. Available defenses depend on the facts, evidence, and circumstances surrounding the alleged discharge.
Both PC 246 and PC 246.3 require that the defendant acted willfully. A purely accidental discharge, where the gun fired due to a mechanical malfunction, a fall, or unintentional contact with the trigger, may defeat both charges. If the evidence shows the discharge was truly accidental, the willfulness element may fail.
California law permits the use of force in genuine self-defense or defense of another person. Evidence may support this defense when the accused reasonably believed that they or another person faced imminent danger, reasonably believed force was necessary to defend against that danger, and used no more force than reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
When supported by the evidence, lawful self-defense or defense of another person may justify the discharge even if the alleged conduct otherwise appears to fit PC 246 or PC 246.3.
PC 246 requires the target to be an inhabited dwelling house, inhabited housecar, inhabited camper, occupied building, occupied motor vehicle, or occupied aircraft. If the target does not meet the statute’s inhabited or occupied requirement, a critical element of the charge may be missing. For example, an unoccupied non-dwelling building or an unoccupied vehicle may not support a PC 246 charge, while a dwelling can still be “inhabited” even when no one is home.
Eyewitness misidentification and weak circumstantial evidence are frequent issues in firearm discharge cases. Defense strategies may include challenging ballistic evidence, questioning the reliability of eyewitness testimony, contesting firearm ownership evidence, and filing motions to suppress evidence obtained through unlawful searches. These challenges can be raised at the preliminary hearing, in pretrial motions, or at trial.
Key Takeaway: Common defenses to firearm discharge charges include showing the discharge was accidental, asserting self-defense, challenging the inhabited or occupied requirement under PC 246, and contesting the sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence. The right defense depends on the specific facts of each case.
When everything’s at risk, we fight for you.
Fabulous staff – George was great. We hired Logan to represent my son in a double felony case. Logan has been amazing – he was very thorough in his explanations for our options, outcomes and his recommendations. God willing we never need to hire…
I am incredibly thankful for Attorney Anna Yum and her team for how they helped me achieve what I thought would be impossible. I was unexpectedly indicted with 10 charges, including four felony charges with recordings as evidence…
Don’t face criminal charges alone – get prosecutorial insight working for your defense today.
Anna R. Yum is the founding attorney of the Law Offices of Anna R. Yum in San Diego and an active California attorney admitted to the State Bar of California in 2005. Her background includes a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law, induction into the Order of Barristers, a judicial externship with Senior U.S. District Judge Robert M. Takasugi, and undergraduate degrees in Communication Studies and International Studies from Northwestern University.
Ms. Yum served as a Riverside County Deputy District Attorney, where her work involved serious criminal matters, including sexual assault, domestic violence, criminal street gangs, child molestation, drug sales, robbery, felony offenses with gun enhancements, attempted murder, and first-degree murder.
The hours and days following an arrest for a discharge offense are important for protecting the accused’s rights and beginning to build a defense. Retaining defense counsel early can help preserve evidence, prepare bail arguments, and address charging issues before the case moves further through court.
After a firearm discharge arrest, the defendant must be brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay and, in most cases, within 48 hours, excluding Sundays and holidays. At arraignment, the judge reads the charges, the defendant enters a plea, and release conditions are addressed.
The 2026 San Diego County Felony Bail Schedule lists bail at $75,000 for PC 246 and $25,000 for PC 246.3, but bail can change based on the facts, enhancements, other charges, prior record, and the judge’s order. Having defense counsel present at arraignment is important for arguing for reasonable bail or release on the defendant’s own recognizance.
In a felony PC 246 case, the prosecution may proceed through a preliminary hearing unless the case is charged by indictment. At a preliminary hearing, the prosecution must present enough evidence to establish probable cause that the defendant committed the charged offense. The defense has the right to cross-examine witnesses and challenge the evidence. A successful challenge at the preliminary hearing can result in reduced charges or dismissal before the case reaches trial.
Law Offices of Anna R. Yum can help evaluate the arrest details, preserve key evidence, and prepare arguments for release, reduced bail, or early charge review.
This is the second time the Law Offices of Anna Yum help me out with a DUI offense. Logan helped me out on my case and managed to get my second DUI reduced to a wet reckless. During this hectic time, this team made communication & paperwork…
I can’t thank Logan enough for the help and support he provided during a very difficult time for our family. He represented my son in a criminal case and was incredibly helpful from the very beginning. Logan was not only knowledgeable and…
Learn More
California law treats firearm discharge offenses involving minors with particular seriousness, but adult-court transfer is not automatic. Proposition 57 eliminated direct filing by prosecutors. In eligible cases, the prosecutor must file a motion asking the juvenile court to transfer the case to adult criminal court, and the judge makes the final decision after a transfer hearing.
Transfer eligibility depends on the minor’s age, the alleged offense, and the factors the juvenile court must consider under California law. If a transfer is granted, the minor faces prosecution in adult court and adult sentencing.
In juvenile court, cases are handled as petitions rather than charges, and rehabilitation remains part of the juvenile court process. However, a sustained petition for an eligible firearm discharge offense can still lead to probation conditions, possible placement consequences in serious cases, and a juvenile record that may affect the minor’s future. Early defense work can focus on transfer issues, rehabilitation options, and the consequences of a sustained juvenile petition.
Discharge charges frequently appear alongside other firearm offenses in a single criminal complaint. The following charges and enhancements commonly accompany PC 246 or PC 246.3:
When multiple charges are stacked in a single case, total sentencing exposure can increase substantially. A defense attorney must evaluate each charge individually and determine whether any counts can be dismissed, reduced, or consolidated during negotiations.
Attorney Anna R. Yum can review each charge and enhancement to identify whether any counts may be challenged, reduced, or addressed through case-specific negotiations.
A conviction under PC 246 or PC 246.3 carries consequences that extend well beyond any prison or jail sentence. These long-term effects can last for years and affect major parts of life after a case concludes.
Because these consequences can affect life after sentencing, plea negotiations should account for firearm rights, licensing, housing, employment, and immigration concerns where applicable.
Key Takeaway: Collateral consequences should be reviewed before any plea because firearm restrictions, licensing issues, housing barriers, and immigration risks may continue after custody or probation ends.
The Law Offices of Anna R. Yum represents clients charged with firearm discharge offenses throughout San Diego County, including:
Cases are handled in San Diego Superior Court locations, including the downtown San Diego courthouse, the El Cajon courthouse, the Vista courthouse, and the South Bay courthouse in Chula Vista.
A firearm discharge charge under California law carries the risk of a felony record, custody time, strike exposure in PC 246 cases, loss of gun rights, and lasting effects on employment and housing. Prompt legal guidance can help protect rights, preserve evidence, and identify defense options before key court deadlines.
Anna R. Yum represents clients in San Diego criminal defense matters involving firearm allegations, including cases where discharge-related charges or enhancements may be at issue. Our gun crimes defense attorney handles every stage of the process, from arraignment and bail hearings through preliminary hearings and jury trials.
Call the Law Offices of Anna R. Yum at (619) 233-4433 to schedule a free, confidential consultation. Our office is located at 1230 Columbia St #1140, San Diego, CA 92101.
Not always. PC 246 is a felony because it applies to the discharge of a firearm at certain inhabited or occupied targets. PC 246.3 is a wobbler, meaning it may be filed as either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the facts, the defendant’s record, and other case-specific circumstances.
Firing a gun into the air can create custody exposure if the prosecution alleges that the discharge was willful, grossly negligent, and capable of causing injury or death. A misdemeanor PC 246.3 conviction can carry up to 364 days in county jail. A felony conviction can carry 16 months, two years, or three years under Penal Code § 1170(h), with custody placement depending on sentencing rules and any state prison exception that may apply.
It can. PC 246 can qualify as a serious felony and strike when the conviction involves the discharge of a firearm at an inhabited dwelling, vehicle, or aircraft. A felony PC 246.3 conviction may also create strike exposure if the record establishes a serious felony basis, such as personal firearm use. Strike analysis depends on the exact conviction, plea record, and sentencing allegations.
Not necessarily. Injury is not required for a conviction under PC 246 or PC 246.3. However, the absence of injury may still matter during charging decisions, plea negotiations, and sentencing because it affects how the facts of the case are evaluated.
Some firearm discharge convictions may be eligible for post-conviction dismissal, but eligibility depends on the conviction, sentence, probation history, and later criminal record. Relief under Penal Code § 1203.4 does not erase the case completely and does not restore firearm rights. A wobbler felony that is reduced to a misdemeanor may also affect the available relief.
PC 246 applies when a firearm is willfully and maliciously discharged at certain inhabited or occupied places, such as a dwelling, occupied building, occupied vehicle, or occupied aircraft. PC 246.3 applies to grossly negligent firearm discharge that could cause injury or death, even without proof that the firearm was aimed at a PC 246 target. The difference matters because PC 246 is a felony, while PC 246.3 may be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
It can. For non-citizens, a firearm discharge conviction may create immigration risks depending on the offense, sentence, and record of conviction. Immigration consequences should be reviewed before any plea because a criminal case resolution can still create serious immigration problems if the plea is not structured carefully.
The timeline depends on the charges, discovery, court calendar, witness issues, negotiations, and whether the case proceeds to a preliminary hearing or trial. Some cases resolve through negotiation, while others take longer because the defense needs time to review evidence, file motions, or prepare for trial.
Don’t face criminal charges alone – get prosecutorial insight working for your defense today.
